I found 20+ people with gigantic followings on mine, and also got a big sponsor from it.
Kit on X
Praise is the largest group in talk about Kit (10 of 41 people on the page), with Subscriber Signals the feature people name most (8); the main complaint is price, and those it pushes away weigh self-hosting or cheaper tools.
First written 27 Oct · what changed · from 50 posts by 41 people
Tracking posts that say “@kit”
Track this for your marketPosts per day, last 30 days
as of Nov 3, 12:00 UTCWhat changed
as of 27 Oct · checked once a monthFirst written 27 Oct. When what people say changes, it shows here.
Tone· 26 posts from 24 people· written 27 Oct
How do people feel about Kit?
Praise is the largest group in reception (10 people), with Subscriber Signals close behind as the feature people name most (8); 5 are disappointed enough to say they are thinking of leaving.
Subscriber Signals is the specific draw. People say it shows who actually reads and who joins their list, and what that changed: one found more than twenty people with big followings in their own list, plus a sponsor; another found X was the most popular platform among their subscribers; a beta user says it "took my list from a number back to a group of people". Fans also praise the product without naming a feature — "nothing better than @kit" is one verdict — while others name markdown paste that auto-formats, a smooth tour, and one recalls an A/B test against their previous tool that Kit won handily.
The disappointment is about price and pace: a $1.4k/yr bill, slow delivery, an experience described as old. That post drew more reactions than anything else in the section.
2 people are new — one has an account and wants to use it properly, one is migrating in and wants the team's help — and neither claims results yet.
- Fans of Kit10
- Loves Subscriber Signals9
- Disappointed, considering leaving5
- New and still getting started2
See 5 of 26 postsHide the posts
Beta tested Subscriber Signals from @kit a while back. It took my list from a number back to a group of people, and a few of them surprised me. Free live workshop on it Thursday Oct 29, 1pm ET. Worth the hour if you send a newsletter. link (affiliate link; Kit’s what I use)
I remember when @kit (then ConvertKit) had just gotten going. I did an A/B test vs. my then-current email solution, and Kit won handily. Thrilled but not surprised at @nathanbarry’s continued success, which is so well-deserved. Congratulations!
nothing better than @kit
i need to switch off @kit $1.4k/yr for a newsletter service start to feel ridiculous yes it makes me money but they deliver so little and so slowly that i genuinely wonder what everyone else is using?
5 of the 26 posts behind this answer, one per person. The other 21, and every new one as it’s posted, come with tracking. Get early access
Pain points· 11 posts from 8 people· written 27 Oct
What do people complain about with Kit?
Cost is the main complaint (4 people), with two themes level behind it: bot filtering that skews open rates (2) and paying for features they never use (2).
Price complaints name the bill: "$1.4k/yr for a newsletter service start to feel ridiculous", with slow delivery alongside it — "they deliver so little and so slowly". One says the product does what they want, just not at that price; another calls for hiring people instead of paying a service that much.
On metrics, people describe a new feature that filters bot clicks and opens, and say the effect is disorienting: the filtering "apparently filters too much (according to Kit team)", dropping open rates by half, so one turned it off; another says it isn't as accurate "yet" as hoped.
The overkill complaint is the same person's: they send emails and don't use pages, forms, the AI features, or the automations, which they find "very unintuitive". One other person says they will switch off because it is too much for what they use.
One person says they can no longer unsubscribe from newsletters sent through Kit and now mark them as spam.
- Expensive for what you get5
- Bot filtering skews open rates3
- Too many features I don't use2
- Can't unsubscribe from Kit emails1
See 5 of 11 postsHide the posts
i need to switch off @kit $1.4k/yr for a newsletter service start to feel ridiculous yes it makes me money but they deliver so little and so slowly that i genuinely wonder what everyone else is using?
hey! that’s the thing: i don’t need all that. i send emails. i don’t use pages, i don’t use forms. i don’t use any of the AI features. and i personally find your automations very unintuitive so i’ve never adopted them either. if you had a plan without all these features that costs half the price, id happily stay
New @kit feature filters bot clicks and opens from your metrics. This is going to drive me to drink, isn't it.
It is once you see the metrics after your first send. You'll question everything. 🫠 The bot opens filtering apparently filters too much (according to Kit team) so I've turned that one off. It'll drop your open rate by half and definitely make you hit the sauce. 🥃
I think you do not need a expensive service like kit these days , you can easily higher humans in cheaper than that doing it for you
5 of the 11 posts behind this answer, one per person. The other 6, and every new one as it’s posted, come with tracking. Get early access
Alternatives· 11 posts· written 27 Oct
What are the alternatives to Kit?
The largest group weighing a move, 4 people, talk about building their own or self-hosting; the rest each name a single tool, from MailerLite and Mailcoach to beehiiv, EmailIt, Sequenzy and Postshiba.
Those who want out compare options rather than settle on one. The build-your-own people talk about running sending on a cheap raw service — Azure Communications Services priced per email, or SES — with open-source list and campaign management on top, or "vibe coding" a replacement, or writing their own email workflows and running them through a service API.
Named tools come one person each, so none is a trend: MailerLite is called "supposedly what all switch to when kit becomes too expensive" by someone who plans to do that, Mailcoach and Postshiba are recommended as much cheaper, and EmailIt or Sequenzy are offered as doing the trick. One person says a service this expensive isn't needed because you can hire people to do it for less.
Not everyone weighing is leaving: one prefers Kit's business model to beehiiv's, saying it plays for the long term, and one recalls an A/B test against their previous tool that Kit won handily.
- Build or host your own4
- MailerLite1
- Mailcoach1
- Postshiba1
- beehiiv1
- Hiring someone instead1
See 5 of 11 postsHide the posts
I’m using azure communications services, (super cheap per email), and open source mail management and campaign manager.
Not sure yet. I may build my own thing the way I want email workflows to look. Then run it through a solid service API
mailerlite is supposedly what all switch to when kit becomes too expensive i’m gonna do that
Kits business model is not like beehiiv and that what i like of nathan. He is playing for longterm.
I remember when @kit (then ConvertKit) had just gotten going. I did an A/B test vs. my then-current email solution, and Kit won handily. Thrilled but not surprised at @nathanbarry’s continued success, which is so well-deserved. Congratulations!
5 of the 11 posts behind this answer, one per person. The other 6, and every new one as it’s posted, come with tracking. Get early access
Questions· 5 posts· written 27 Oct
What do people ask about Kit?
Questions split two ways, each level: is Kit not free for plain sending (2 people), and how do you get the team's help with your list (2); one person asks how creators get to record at Kit's studios.
The pricing questions come at the cost complaints from outside: one asks whether Kit isn't free under 10k subs, and another presses harder — if you only send emails and don't use the other features, why pay for Creator Pro instead of staying on the free plan, since "if you just send emails then kit is free". Neither gets an answer in the posts.
The help questions are practical and from people moving in: one, migrating to Kit, asks how to get the team to brainstorm on their list and get value from it; another simply asks what the growth concierge is. A person with a Kit account who wants to use it properly is filed here too.
The remaining question is about access rather than the product: how creators get to record at Kit studios.
- Isn't Kit free for just sending emails?2
- How do I get the team's help with my list?2
- How do creators record at Kit studios?1
See the 5 postsHide the posts
mate. you don't use those features then why are you paying for creator pro instead of just the free plan? if you just send emails then kit is free??? genuienly curious why you are paying for creator pro but then saying you don't use any of the feature you are literally paying for
Isn’t it free under 10k subs?
Hey @nathanbarry how do I get you to brainstorm on my list. I’m migrating to kit rn and would love to make the most of it
What's the growth concierge?
how do creators get to record at kit studios?
Wishes· 5 posts· written 27 Oct
What do people want from Kit?
Two wishes are level: more capable MCP and API (2 people) and sends split by what someone bought (2); one person wants a send-only plan at about half the price.
The MCP and API ask is about not opening the dashboard: one wants to send test emails through the MCP instead of going back into the UI, and another asks "what is the point of an MCP or API if I can't upload images", wanting an agent to post on their behalf.
The purchase-history wish is about who gets which message: one wants knowing who already bought to change the next send, "split buyers from browsers instead of one blast for everyone". Another describes already swapping just the CTA by a buyer tag so people who own something aren't pitched it again and get the next product instead.
The plan idea comes from the price complaint: a plan without pages, forms, AI features or automations, at half the current price — the person says they would happily stay if it existed.
- More capable MCP and API2
- Split sends by what buyers bought2
- A cheaper send-only plan1
See the 5 postsHide the posts
@kit what is the point of an MCP or API if I can't upload images. I don't want to login to your dashboard my agent should be able to post for me.
@kit would be great if we could send test emails via the MCP vs having to go back into the UI
knowing who already bought should change the next send. use it to split buyers from browsers instead of one blast for everyone.
One of my favorite uses for this is swapping just the CTA by a buyer tag, so people who already bought don't get pitched the thing they own , but the next product they’re ready for
hey! that’s the thing: i don’t need all that. i send emails. i don’t use pages, i don’t use forms. i don’t use any of the AI features. and i personally find your automations very unintuitive so i’ve never adopted them either. if you had a plan without all these features that costs half the price, id happily stay
Posts are shown the way X shows them. One of them yours? Here’s why it’s shown, and how to take it off.
Also in Newsletter platforms
- Substack+4%The largest group of people praise Substack and recommend specific newsletters to read there, while complaints splinter across AI filler, paid subscriptions, clunky use and a feed that floods.671 posts / 7d
- Beehiiv+11%Beehiiv's talk is praise and a price backlash at once: 36 people credit it with real results and 25 defend what it costs, while 25 name price as their complaint and self-hosted clones, Marc Lou's loudest, carry the rest.440 posts / 7d
- Mailchimp−34%Price leads: 7 people call Mailchimp too expensive, citing fees that climb with list size and bills for unsubscribed contacts; others weigh cheaper routes like MailCheap, Brevo or Amazon SES.266 posts / 7d
Get every post about Kit, filtered and labelled
This page is the summary. Tracking gives you the stream behind it for any brand, keyword or @mention: each new pain point, request and question as it’s posted, with the spam and promotions already taken out.



















