Beehiiv on X

R

Ryan Gilbert@rjgilbert

i just sent the best looking newsletter @beehiiv has ever seen (not biased at all)

T

Tom Alder@tomaldertweets

the easiest, no-BS guide to building a waitlist in 2026 (that actually gets paying customers) +the exact @beehiiv setup behind our 2k signups and 41 paid users for link Steal all of it. Here's how it works: 1/ Your landing page has 1 job: get the email ↳ The cursor's already blinking in the box on load ↳ 1 button in the sticky navbar points back to the box ↳ The same box again at the bottom ↳ A live counter for social proof, right under the box ↳ The box posts directly to the beehiiv API (PS: full landing page structure + copywriting guide in the comments 👇 ours got 1,242 signups in the first 24 hours) 2/ Qualify every signup as they join ↳ Redirect all signups to a beehiiv survey ↳ Prefill their email so it's 1 less step ↳ Only ask questions that let you assess ICP fit ↳ Every answer saves to a custom field ↳ Aim for 70%+ completion rate 3/ Score them, and invite the best first ↳ 3+ hrs/day on messages? +3. Business owner? +2. ↳ Highest scores get the first invites ↳ Your first users shape the product ↳ So make sure they're who you're building for ↳ Our first batch of invites converted at ~37% 4/ Make the welcome email's primary CTA a reply ↳ "Reply with the word 'quicker'" ↳ Replies improve deliverability ↳ Gmail Outlook Yahoo put you in Inbox (not spam) ↳ Secondary CTA: share the page with a friend 5/ Keep signups engaged ↳ Email the waitlist at least 2x a week ↳ AB test subject lines (easy +5% open-rate) ↳ Anyone who joins late misses the story ↳ So link to an archive of past sends in welcome ↳ Archive populates automatically from beehiiv API 6/ Use broadcasts for customer research ↳ End every email with 1 question ↳ "Tell me about your most recent DM fumble" ↳ The replies are your discovery / validation ↳ And they improve deliverability 7/ Let agents assign users to batches ↳ Plug Claude/ChatGPT into beehiiv MCP ↳ Feed it new signups, survey answers, and replies ↳ Sweep all comments on social posts and DMs ↳ It hands you the next 50-100 people to invite What we're building next: → Every broadcast rewritten as an evergreen drip → A segment of active users with its own onboarding sequence → Survey answers mapped to who actually sticks Your waitlist isn't a list. It's an automated sorting + invite machine. (built the entire thing on beehiiv - surveys, custom fields, API + MCP) What would you add to this setup? (PS The beehiiv free plan is more than enough to get started, but once you want the more advanced features, use code “STRATEGY30” to get 30% off for 3 months → link

M

Manuel Bleve 🐝@manuel_bleve

tbh sending emails has always been a commodity. Not sure beehiiv is about that. Otherwise we wouldn't have the biggest brands in the world using us (they can easily vibe code a tool that sends email too) I launched my newsletter (link 3 months ago. I pay beehiiv $59/m, I earned $6432 from beehiiv built-in recommendation (screenshot attached) I will happily pay 20% more when I have a full blown sales team working for me + an army of tools for growth and monetization And while I could be biased as a beehiiv employee, I'm saying this as a beehiiv user There is for sure a lesson for our team here though With 50k subs in your niche you'd should've made back the $300/m you paid us at least 10 times So maybe we're doing something wrong about letting our users understand the full power of beehiiv We'll fix that

M

Manny Reyes@mannyyreyyes

.@denk_tweets might be the most unfiltered CEO in tech right now 😂 ICYMI, Tyler took to X to share his thoughts on @marclou's new newsletter platform. And while you might disagree with his delivery, I think he makes a good point. I understand wanting to save $100–$1,000/month on newsletter software. If you're running a small newsletter, experimenting with a cheaper, vibe-coded alternative might make sense. But a serious publisher running multiple newsletters with hundreds of thousands of subscribers? Almost zero chance. When email is critical to your business, you're paying for more than the software itself. Security, support, reliability, and infrastructure all matter. Vibes are not enough. That's what people notoriously underestimate when comparing a weekend project to a platform like @beehiiv. Meanwhile, beehiiv keeps reporting record months and growing ARR. I give Tyler a lot of credit for building the company he wants to build without worrying too much about corporate optics. You can disagree with his delivery, but I don’t think he’ll lose sleep over it and neither will the investors. P.S. I cover stories like this, share practical Meta ads tips, and break down winning newsletter ads every Saturday in my free newsletter, Growth Levers. If you're growing a newsletter, you can subscribe here: link

C

Chris Broadfoot@_chrisbroadfoot

I’ve been running mine on Beehiiv for over 3 years now, been able to keep a 51% open rate and actually enjoy working on it each week.

O

Ole Lehmann@itsolelehmann

people misunderstood what my point was I don't think everyone will start vibecoding their own SaaS but when I saw Marc post I was thinking: damn, I pay 3k for beehiiv too, I wonder if there's someone building a cheaper alternative now I think it's a bigger factor for saas that people will start heavily undercutting in price offering a similari-ish product if marc would offer me 70% of beehiivs features at 80% off i'll most likely take it and that same thing will happen to a lot of companies SaaS had an insane business model for a long time, and these times (at least for incumbents) are over imo

G

Gabe Fletcher@gabefletcher

is this the beehiiv complaint department? excellent I have a few grievances that require attention.. I pay beehiiv $2,400 a year to email 3,600 subscribers about 8 times a month. I was weighing if I was going to stay after the price hike. My time costs more that the additional money so it didn't really matter. I wasn't swayed by marc's press run on it either. but this? presenting this entire wall of bs as the entry fee for running a good newsletter or infra is bullshit. Not only is it genuinely not true, you come off like a snobby gatekeeping pos. so on principal - fuck you. Its also bullshit that you want to stick your branding on my newsletter if I downgrade so fuck you a second time. Raising prices 19%-20% doesn't make you creator friendly. I don't think you're a bad company or person for that because you've brought a ton of value into the product. But need I remind you of your tweet history to remind you of what you campaigned on. Do these values still hold? I would argue they don't. Transaction % or Raising of Price per month - not really still on the creator friendly/creator first kick. "beehiiv’s revenue would be way higher if we taxed 10-15% of your earnings and locked you in forever. but we don’t do that bc being creator-first is a principle this company will live and die by" link "last month @beehiiv launched Digital Products, an AI website builder, Podcasts, Dynamic Content, etc. and didn’t raise prices a dollar meanwhile, the most innovative thing Kit has done in years is change their name and increase prices beehiiv is the most creator-friendly platform and takes 0% of any user transactions‼️" link So here ya go folks. Vibe code your own beehiiv. link

A

Adam Chernoff@adamchernoff

12,025 subs with an 84.5% open rate on 3-5 sends per week. I have tried all @beehiiv boosts, referrals, ads and more. None of them have benefitted me in any way. All bad subs, which are not engaged. Don't even try them any more. I just do 100% organic from here and podcasts.

A

Axel Schapmann@aschapmann

David vs. Goliath. Honestly, I don't really know what to think about this whole Marc Lou vs. beehiiv situation. On one hand, you have @marclou, an indie hacker vibe coding a cheaper alternative to beehiiv after its price increases. On the other, you have @denk_tweets, CEO of beehiiv, a major newsletter platform, who keeps posting to defend his company, contradict Marc, and seemingly try to discredit him. I really like Marc, so I'm obviously biased. But seeing the CEO of a company that size repeatedly go after an indie hacker building a competing product feels a bit strange. What do you think about all this?

J

Jordan A. Schwann 📍@jordan_schwann

@beehiiv @denk_tweets @JakeHurd_ Need urgent help. Losing sales! Locked out on campaign night. Been using BH for 3+ years now. Sent your support an email. My campaign launch for my client starts tonigt w/ deadline Tuesday! We're doing everything compliantly. We'll fix if not.

M

Marc Lou@marclou

So many people asked me to make it open-source, so here you go: MailCheap — Self-hosted newsletters on Amazon SES: 💸 $0.10 per 1,000 emails ✍️ Editor with live preview 📰 Multiple newsletters 📝 Signup forms + API 🌐 Public archive 📊 Stats & growth charts 🧹 List cleanup 📬 Bounce + spam protection → link 92% cheaper than Beehiiv (for me). Have fun!

I

ILIAS ISM@illyism

I don't think brand is a moat Actually, I think brand can become an anti-moat for SaaS People love luxury brands because owning them signals status But SaaS is just a tool and for a lot of founders, the status comes from spending less on it I think Nobody brags about having the biggest software bill (we did, for a little while, on token spend) Now people like @levelsio, @marclou and others brag about replacing expensive subscriptions with something they built themselves I think the brand becomes part of the story and the more recognizable the tool, the more expensive it is, the more interesting it is to say you've replaced it in a single prompt "I replaced some random newsletter tool" doesn't get the same attention as "I replaced Beehiiv" Beehiiv spends years building recognition, someone else can use that recognition to get attention for leaving And I think the same thing will happen to the products built by the indie hackers doing the replacing today (already thought twice about canceling datafast and just hosting it myself on Hetzner, it really is just a prompt away) So I'm skeptical of brand alone as a SaaS moat, churning is a triumph But probably not true for enterprise, "nobody gets fired for buying AWS/Salesforce/Workday" is probably still true

V

Vivek Naskar@vivek_naskar

I'm moving SavvyMonk from Beehiiv to Substack. Growth stalled here. Substack Notes gives me a better shot at reaching new readers. Current subscribers, I'll move you over. Nothing to do on your end. link P.S. I will transfer my domain to Substack.

L

Letterland LIVE@LetterlandLIVE

Why did Express Checkout move from @beehiiv to @Substack? @JMovsowitz still loves beehiiv, especially for B2B. But Express Checkout started getting organic traction from "curious consumers," people who are nerdy about the consumer space. And without a discovery network, they were capping their reach. On Substack, the feed gets them discovered. It's the same playbook that grew them on Instagram.

F

🤟🏽 Fejiro Gospel@fejirogospel

Marc Lou says his next Beehiiv bill would have been $4,000. So he built his own newsletter platform in a few prompts. Now he pays under $300 a year. He didn't need a better platform than Beehiiv. He needed one that works for Marc Lou. Issue #16 of Signal is live: Your Customer Can Build It Now. Link in the reply ↓

S

Sebastian Buzdugan@sebuzdugan

99.3% delivery still hides inbox placement, what share reaches primary inboxes

B

Bill Kerr@bill_kerrrrr

Open rates are bogus: what was the CTR?

E

Etta | Substack & Beehiiv Specialist@EttaStackSetup

Agreed, opens are directional, not exact. For purge decisions I’d lean on clicks plus activity across the last several sends rather than one open number.

T

TS@tilseif

What about domain reputation though? As far as I understand it, you usually benefit from your providers (beehiiv) scale in terms of deliverability, no? Genuinely curious!

A

Amanbehumble@amanbehumble

is beehiiv the best place to start a newsletter in 2026 Nicole?

J

John Apolinar@itsjohnapolinar

Yeah, I'd love your insight! Especially since it would automate the process a little bit further. Right now, I'm copying and pasting.

J

Jacob Brown@JakeBlockchain

"use beehiiv MCP to draft latest newsletter."

C

Cagri Sarigoz@cagrisarigoz

I think @beehiiv should segment their features and offer a more affordable pricing plan for the vast majority of their users who just send newsletters. They don't need podcasting, product sales, community, etc., and shouldn't be forced to pay for features they don't use.

N

Nic Conley@niconley

we just need website edit access, and it will solve all of my problems

A

Al@AlDev0

pulling post stats into one weekly summary would be the first one i'd set up