Skip to content
unnudged
brandSteady

Perplexity on X

Praise leads — games built from a couple of days of prompting, trip plans, school materials — against 14 people who call it wrong or finished. The loudest arguments are about two new things: faster Computer runs, and running locally on a Mac.

First written 27 Oct · what changed · from 139 posts by 124 people

Tracking posts that say “@perplexity_ai”

Track this for your market
Posts, last 24h
36
+57%vs. previous 24h
Posts, last 7 days
240
102 in the last 72h
Velocity
34/day
7-day average
Momentum
+5%
Last 24h vs. a normal day this week

Posts per day, last 30 days

as of Nov 3, 09:00 UTC
2001000Oct 20: 40 postsOct 20Oct 21: 71 postsOct 22: 113 postsOct 23: 36 postsOct 24: 5 postsOct 25: 59 postsOct 26: 61 postsOct 26Oct 27: 24 postsOct 28: 48 postsOct 29: 12 postsOct 30: 22 postsOct 31: 95 postsNov 1: 10 postsNov 2: 51 postsNov 2

What changed

as of 27 Oct · checked once a month

First written 27 Oct. When what people say changes, it shows here.

Tone· 83 posts from 75 people· written 27 Oct

How do people feel about Perplexity?

Praise is the largest theme — 35 of 75 people speak well of it — but not a majority: 14 are disappointed, and recent talk about faster Computer runs and running locally divides between enthusiasm and demands for proof.

What draws praise is range of use. One person credits a couple of days of prompting with a full Halo-style game — a project file, screenshots from real Halo games, sponsor logos turned into gear — while others describe trip planning, school worksheets and presentations, or an assistant they ask everything. A paying user says they would drop their other subscriptions before Perplexity.

The disappointed are fewer but blunt: one calls it "utter crap" and cancelled after two weeks, others ask what happened to it or say nobody uses it, and one user posted a plain goodbye.

Recent talk is about two changes. Ultrafast, shipped as a speed setting rather than a separate model pick, draws praise for long Computer tasks: less waiting between asking and getting finished work back. Running the model and agent on your own Mac is called "the version of an agent we'd trust with real files". Skeptics want the claims stress-tested past the math benchmark, worry about agents committing to main, and ask whether local holds up when the Wi-Fi drops.

  • Loves it37
  • Disappointed14
  • Speed is the upgrade11
  • Local-first is the draw11
  • Skeptical, wants proof10
See 5 of 83 posts

.@colindougherty built the Ecomm Cowboy Halo game with @perplexity_ai. The process: a project file, reference screenshots from real Halo games, and every sponsor logo turned into gear. The Slash saber. The Perplexity pistol. The Comcast cannon. The Proppel peacemaker. Then rounds of playtesting, a 2v2 mode and an eight-player King of the Hill. A couple of days of prompting is all it took.

I still don't understand how the hell @perplexity_ai computer can be so amazing. It is one of the greatest products that I've ever used. I would cancel all my subscriptions but never, ever would I cancel Perplexity and @cursor_ai. These are two brilliantly amazing products that have ever been built. Truly proves that great applications will deliver immense value despite being built on top of a frontier model. Again just making it clear: I don't know about how much value they will be able to capture but they definitely do create amazing value for all their users.

5 of the 83 posts behind this answer, one per person. The other 78, and every new one as it’s posted, come with tracking. Get early access

Pain points· 29 posts from 26 people· written 27 Oct

What do people complain about with Perplexity?

Complaints split evenly between money and accuracy: 6 people find fast modes and features locked behind Max or Pro, and 6 say answers are wrong or unverified — level, with billing trouble behind them at 4 people.

Price complaints centre on gating: Ultrafast Astra and Sol are only on the Max plan, one person doubts the extra speed is worth double the price, and a Pro subscriber who got a week of use was told to wait until next year for more credits. Others describe a free Pro offer followed by a card charge, a cancellation answered with a warning of further charge attempts within 24-48 hours, credit-card details that can't be deleted, and no automatic invoice emails on enterprise plans.

On accuracy, people describe names introduced without checking their relevance, a chart drawn wrong the first time and right the second, and an answer that is usually "according to a website we didn't pay". Two say it is wrong constantly, or reframes their complaint instead of correcting the answer.

Smaller counts: fully local mode wants 36GB of memory and the app takes 20GB, one user keeps getting GPT-6.1 after choosing another model and threatens to cancel, and Ask and Discover Daily are gone.

  • Price and credits6
  • Wrong or unverifiable answers6
  • Billing and cancellation5
  • Heavy hardware demands3
  • Serves a model I didn't pick3
  • Features that disappeared2
See 5 of 29 posts

@perplexity_ai Your AI introduced names without verifying their relevance, then admitted it shouldn’t have used them as evidence. When challenged, it repeatedly reframed my complaint instead of correcting its answer. This is misleading, not just a citation problem. #DontTrustAI

5 of the 29 posts behind this answer, one per person. The other 24, and every new one as it’s posted, come with tracking. Get early access

Alternatives· 7 posts from 6 people· written 27 Oct

What are the alternatives to Perplexity?

There is no shared rival: each comparison is a single person's, naming Claude and DeepSeek, Google AI Studio, Bloomberg, built-in search in ChatGPT and Gemini, Gemini's free tier, paid job-search tools, or models they run themselves.

The comparisons don't converge. One user says Claude and DeepSeek have a more reasonable chat UI, and that Google AI Studio gives more control over context by editing or removing messages. One asks how many people actually move off Bloomberg, doubting the habit breaks. One argues Perplexity is fading because OpenAI, Google and Anthropic put web search and source citations inside their own chatbots. One expects Computer's background tasks and browser automation to make paid job-search tools redundant for job hunting and networking. One user who hit usage limits says they built and run their own models without caps. And one lists Perplexity among the alternatives once Gemini limited free accounts to its Lite model.

None of these posts travelled far.

  • Claude and DeepSeek1
  • Google AI Studio1
  • Bloomberg1
  • Search built into ChatGPT and Gemini1
  • Paid job search tools1
  • Own self-hosted models1
See 5 of 7 posts

#Perplexity AI is fading from mainstream tech headlines because major competitors (like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic) have integrated web-search and source-citation features directly into their own dominant chatbots, absorbing Perplexity's core use case? @perplexity_ai ??

@perplexity_ai computer is sick. Background tasks + browser automation is going to make it awesome job hunting and networking. Sucks to be a paid job search tool though 👀 link

5 of the 7 posts behind this answer, one per person. The other 2, and every new one as it’s posted, come with tracking. Get early access

Questions· 20 posts· written 27 Oct

What do people ask about Perplexity?

The largest question, from 6 of 20 people, is what Perplexity has become: still relevant, dead, or now an agent. The rest are practical: how local and cloud modes divide work, whether the fast models lose quality, and what usage costs.

Six people ask some version of what happened to @perplexity_ai, from rarely seeing it around to "Is it dead?" and not hearing updates for months, through to one who hasn't thought about it in a while and asks whether we're still in the game; another wonders whether Perplexity has turned into an agent.

Local mode raises the design questions. Does a local task that needs a web lookup escalate to the cloud automatically, or stop and say so? Which tasks still need the cloud once the on-device model hits its limits, and how does a hybrid setup run? Two people want numbers first: how much RAM before it feels usable, and how many tokens per second it produces.

The fast models get the same test: same quality, or a lighter variant that trades accuracy for speed? Others ask how two agents committing to the same repo resolve conflicts, what actually breaks inside a 0.0002% error rate, what verification adds in latency, and what one real Computer workflow costs a month.

  • What has Perplexity become?6
  • How do local and cloud mode work together?3
  • Is the fast model as good?3
  • How do agent merge conflicts get handled?2
  • Does local mode run well on my machine?2
  • What does that error rate leave out?2
See 5 of 20 posts

Genuine question: when a local task needs something the on-device model can't handle - a web lookup, say - does the agent escalate to the cloud automatically, or stop and say so? That local/cloud boundary is the thing I'd want to test first.

5 of the 20 posts behind this answer, one per person. The other 15, and every new one as it’s posted, come with tracking. Get early access

Wishes· 13 posts from 12 people· written 27 Oct

What do people want from Perplexity?

No request has more than 2 people behind it. The largest are level at 2 people each: automatic local-or-cloud routing, open source with a fully local build, and Perplexity as a business platform. Every other ask is one person's.

The routing group wants Perplexity to decide for itself whether a request runs on the local model or in the cloud — "a built in auto-routing mechanism", one person calls it, and sticky too. Another would allow local models in chat while flagging that cloud gives better answers, and suggests hosting the routing classifier on the device.

Level with them: people asking for open source and a fully local build, and people who want Perplexity to become a business platform, either as a verified-outcome platform or as "the orchestrator of the business operating system".

The single asks are concrete: local mode working on the mainstream 16GB laptops people buy, a Perplexity Code product shipped soon, faster work on Windows, PPLX Radio brought back, an append-only commit log recording which agent and session made each change with clear merge rules, and controls to check a long task before it finishes.

  • Automatic local-or-cloud routing3
  • Open source and fully local2
  • Perplexity as a business platform2
  • Running on 16GB machines1
  • Perplexity Code1
  • Shipped faster on Windows1
See 5 of 13 posts

Perplexity should evolve into the verified outcome platform building a moat around trusted execution and independently verified results, and expanding into the infrastructure that enables businesses to deploy reliable, profitable AI agents at scale. @perplexity_ai @AskPerplexity

5 of the 13 posts behind this answer, one per person. The other 8, and every new one as it’s posted, come with tracking. Get early access

In their words

How do people talk about Perplexity?

The phrases people use most, counted once per person.

  1. 1“fully local”5
  2. 2“local agent”3
  3. 3“computer tasks”3
  4. 4“error rate”3
  5. 5“run fully local”2
  6. 6“long tasks”2
  7. 7“less waiting”2
  8. 8“real files”2
  9. 9“shared repo”2
  10. 10“two agents”2

Posts are shown the way X shows them. One of them yours? Here’s why it’s shown, and how to take it off.

Also in AI search and answer engines

Get every post about Perplexity, filtered and labelled

This page is the summary. Tracking gives you the stream behind it for any brand, keyword or @mention: each new pain point, request and question as it’s posted, with the spam and promotions already taken out.